My Off-The Cuff Review of “The Mist” and "Garth Meranghi's 'Darkplace.'"
“The Mist” was written in the ‘80’s, when Steven King had just built his Terrormatic Trope-Cycler. As such, it has a lot of King’s tropes but still has the style to still make a compelling read. Giant spiders? Mommy abandonment? Impractical experimentation by the government? Clackety-clack-spit!
The film is a 90% reproduction of the novella. The ending has been changed from the vague dammit-I-don’t-wanna-write-another-novel finish that also is part of the more recent Steven King short fiction ouvre. However, the movie ending is actually better, but more on that.
The first half-hour is okay. Dad and Mom and Kid trade wooden quips, because hell, we know what we’re here for, let’s get to the store for Chrissake.
The director is good. The acting is consistent and believable. There are no weak performances. It’s refreshing to see a horror director who can work with actors to create mood. There is just enough shake to the camera, just enough dead space to the shots to suck you into the action. The problem is after the first half-hour, when a novella has to be padded into a full-length movie.
The director had worked with King before and apparently has an operating license to the Trope-Cycler. Here comes the crazy Christian! And the tragic love story! And the smack to the head social commentary!
King’s stories always steered clear of most Hollywood clichés. Sadly, this is a Hollywood movie, which means that King’s clichés are now compounded by Hollywood clichés.
You know how the blacks are always the first to get killed? This movie brings an efficiency and tidiness never before seen. Kids get killed? No way. Middle-class old people? More resourceful than trained military personnel. Poor folk? Stupid and gullible. Any actor you have never seen before? Put red shirts on ‘em and beam ‘em to the surface.
The critters are believable. There’s a little tell-tale CGI look to the tentacles, but the models were first-rate.
The new ending is grim by Hollywood standards, but the writer pushed it and added a cheap shot conclusion that took away its emotion. The audience literally groaned at it.
Good munching. Good action. Good adaptation. If you know what you're getting yourself into, enjoy then groan.
The sound of groaning brings us to my latest purchase, which spoofs both ‘80’s episodic horror and genre writers a little too full of themselves. In 2004, British comic actor Matthew Holness invented a horror writer named Garth Merenghi. Known for his hip style and smoldering glare, Garth's novels included such classic chillers as The Ooze (can water die?), Afterbirth (a mutated placenta attacks Bristol) and Black Fang (where rats learn to drive). The multitalented Garth persuaded BBC4 to allow him to produce “Garth Merenghi’s ‘Darkplace’”, which Garth wrote, directed and played lead. The problem? The show is bad. Aggressively bad.
The dialogue is stilted, chatty and far too clever. The action is way over the top. The plot is predictable and the characters flat.
Anyone can write badly. What this show pulls off is a pitch-perfect reproduction of amateur horror writing. Editors and slush readers will sit in awe.
Those who appreciate production values will find the same care in destroying all those details. Music cues are garbled. Laughs and screams go on for too long. The special effects aren’t special and have no effect.
Like the TV spoofs in the movie “Idiocracy”, “Darkplace” will follow you around as you watch real TV shows on SciFi or USA, nudging you and saying “Yeah, see? I did that.”
Between scenes are interview bits where Garth and his producer show epic levels of self-delusion. If you like “A Mighty Wind” and “Tales of the Darkside”, you will enjoy “Darkplace.” Look for the performers on YouTube in current Brit-coms like “The Mighty Boosh”, “The IT Crowd”, and “Little Britain.”
Here's a clip: